Lewy introduces the problem, namely, that it is common for historians to deem the Indians’ plight in American History as intentional genocide on the part of Euro-Americans.
He presents numerous historiography in order to validate this problem. He then presents his thesis: “That American Indians suffered horribly is indisputable. But whether their suffering amounted to a ‘holocaust,’ or to genocide, is another matter” (45). Most Indians died of infectious diseases brought by the Europeans—does not prove genocidal intent. There is no conclusive evidence of biological warfare being used against the Indians intentionally.The U. S.
government even tried to inoculate the Indians against smallpox. The Pequot Massacre (1636) is not evidence of genocidal intent. He cites that the Indians had been torturing prisoners outside the forts and threatening villages, so the Puritans reacted out of self-protection—not necessarily out of intent to commit genocide. Same issue with King Philip’s War (1675/76). The council in Boston still would punish colonists who cruelly murdered Indians. Warfare on the Plains against Indians usually followed the rules of war. The U.
S. rmy under Sherman and Sheridan were combating Indians raids. Methods of destroying lodges and stores of food in order to force the Indians into submission. Ex. of Wounded Knee—“tragic accident of war” (50). He notes that some Indian women and children were allowed out of the encampment and wounded Indian warriors were given medical care. Under the definition of genocide stipulated by the General Assembly of the United Nations, the deaths of Indians do not constitute genocide because they were not intentionally aimed at destroying the Indians as a cultural group.
Exception of California Indian atrocities. Lewy argues that one must always contextualize their judgment of historical actors. Namely, one cannot impose the values or standards of one’s own time period on past societies, which did not necessarily share the same values and standards. Overall, Lewy claims the conduct of war mostly followed the standards of right and wrong for the respective time period. In America’s case, genocide was more an individual guilt—not the whole nation or the government’s intention.
At Solution Essays, we are determined to deliver high-quality papers to our clients at a fair price. To ensure this happens effectively, we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees. This guarantees will ensure you enjoy using our website which is secure and easy to use.
Most companies do not offer a money-back guarantee but with Solution Essays, it’s either a quality paper or your money back. Our customers are assured of high-quality papers and thus there are very rare cases of refund requests due to quality concern.Read more
All our papers are written from scratch and according to your specific paper instructions. This minimizes any chance of plagiarism. The papers are also passed through a plagiarism-detecting software thus ruling out any chance of plagiarism.Read more
We offer free revisions in all orders delivered as long as there is no alteration in the initial order instruction. We will revise your paper until you are fully satisfied with the order delivered to you.Read more
All data on our website is stored as per international data protection rules. This ensures that any personal data you share with us is stored safely. We never share your personal data with third parties without your consent.Read more