Intermediate punishments are punishments, which are more restraining, compared to probation however, less restrictive compared to imprisonment. The primary purposes of intermediate punishment are to trim down the pressures of filled to capacity jails and prisons, in addition to short-staffed probation officials, along with offices. There exist two primary kinds of judgments for committing a crime, these are either to be incarcerated, or probation nevertheless the judges in addition has additional sentencing alternatives that he/she can extend, for instance intermediate punishments. These punishments comprise of fines, society service, restoration, forfeiture, along with pretrial diversion programs (Ulmer, 2004).
Fines refer to sums paid to the court due to the crime that has been committed. Society/community service refers to a situation where an individual has to work without pay in order to pay off the debt to public. Restitution refers to the sum of money, which the judge commands the wrongdoer to recompense the individual, family or enterprise for damages associated to the offense. Forfeiture points to the government’s seizures of every private property associated to the criminal deed. Whereas, Pretrial diversion programs points to an option to trial where the wrongdoer is offered particular counseling or undergoes a treatment program in response for an abandonment of all the charges. Additionally there exist other program that fall under the category of intermediate sanctions for instance, daytime reporting center whereby the lawbreaker reports on a daily basis, for treatment, edification, and incapacitation; thorough supervision probation that are supervised by probation officers with lesser case loads, and the restriction are stricter than normal probation. Others include shock imprisonment, also referred to as, “scared straight” a type of remedy that shocks with the destitution of prison whereas home detention and electronic supervision, is whereby a criminal serves their sentence at home within a restricted area (Abadinsky, 2012).
The phrase “the punishment fits the crime”
applicability to the intermediate punishment is by the fact that the lawbreaker
is entirely free and the judge awards a specific kind of intermediate
punishment depending on the weight of the offense. Thus, essentially the wrongdoer pays for his
wrongdoings in a just manner.
Ulmer, J. T. (2004). Restrictive intermediate punishments and recidivism in Pennsylvania. Federal Sentencing Reporter. doi:10.1525/fsr.2004.16.3.182
H. (2012). Probation and parole: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
At Solution Essays, we are determined to deliver high-quality papers to our clients at a fair price. To ensure this happens effectively, we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees. This guarantees will ensure you enjoy using our website which is secure and easy to use.
Most companies do not offer a money-back guarantee but with Solution Essays, it’s either a quality paper or your money back. Our customers are assured of high-quality papers and thus there are very rare cases of refund requests due to quality concern.Read more
All our papers are written from scratch and according to your specific paper instructions. This minimizes any chance of plagiarism. The papers are also passed through a plagiarism-detecting software thus ruling out any chance of plagiarism.Read more
We offer free revisions in all orders delivered as long as there is no alteration in the initial order instruction. We will revise your paper until you are fully satisfied with the order delivered to you.Read more
All data on our website is stored as per international data protection rules. This ensures that any personal data you share with us is stored safely. We never share your personal data with third parties without your consent.Read more