An ethical dilemma can be defined in various ways, which include a situation where the agent must make a decision that is viewed as the best course of action (Stuart, 2005). The other type of dilemma is one that gives the agent different options to choose from (Stuart, 2005). The third is one that will compromise the ethical principle no matter the course of action taken (Stuart, 2005). The ethical principles that form this dilemma are the course of action that a compromise of the moral law will be broken no matter the course of work because of the situation that Aiden has put the doctor in and she cannot be able to do much save for contacting emergency services.
The stakeholders in this dilemma are Aiden and his entire family because of the message that has been left on her answering machine. This could quickly turn into a case of the boy cried wolf, and no chances should be taken. This situation meets the criteria because Aiden is a different person once he is drunk, and despite not following his threats according to the girlfriend, there might be other triggers around Aiden. This could be an emergency, and she has to take the course of action that is best suitable, and including other researchers could prove too late (Roberts, 2008). Dr. Yeung’s absence of a license and other documentation could be unfortunate because she lacks the necessary training that could have best fitted her for this situation.
This could significantly affect her research depending on the course of action she decides to take eventually. They can be used as guidelines to acknowledge which step to take to avoid slow decision making by the professional (Roberts, 2008). Dr. Yeung could decide that she will call a much more qualified practitioner than herself. Dr. Yeung should begin a training program that would enable her to be in a better position to avoid this type of dilemma in the future.
Roberts, J., L. Wolfer, and M. Mele. (2008) “Why Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Withdraw Protection Orders.” Journal of Family Violence 23(5): 369-375
Stuart, G. (2005) “Improving Violence Intervention Outcomes Integrating Alcohol Treatment.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 20(4): 388-393.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more