Background of the CFAA
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) prohibits access to a computer without authorization. CFAA redefines intangible property under tort law. CFAA also criminalized incidences of the computer-related breaches, with specific provisions for the development of the malicious code and possible denial of service (Ilt.eff.org, 2019). The act was further amended to accommodate the USA Patriot Act of 2002.
CFAA might positively address
CFAA has advanced several sections that address the general misuse of computer systems. Sections 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(1-7) and 18 U.S.C. § 1030(b-c) provides coverage against computer espionage, jurisdiction against trespassing, control over commitment of fraud, possible control of damaging of the computer worms and viruses, control over passwords trafficking, jurisdiction against threats, possible control on conspiracy to violates and finally control over penalties. McGowan (2017) also notes CFAA defines the jurisdiction of hardware utility, minimizing ambiguity of earlier laws related to computer-related breaches.
Examples of abuses
The government has been criticized for the overreaching CFAA; civil cases are the most common example of violations. CFAA has been criticized for transforming misdemeanour cases into a felony. Case United States v. Kane, 2011 transformed the case from misdemeanour to a felony, for two years, the defendant was subjected to criminal wire fraud charges. In the case of United States v. Aaron Swartz, 2011, the government violated provisions by burdening the defendant with several other cases. Shackelford (2012) as such believes CFAA would be efficient by applying an Engineering Task Force and the ITU, based different governance models that retain internet sovereignty and creation of internet freedom conceptualizing cybersecurity under internet governance.
Efficiency against Cyberattacks
CFAA protects the business from cyber attacks given its jurisdiction extends coverage for a private right of action, injunction and presenting equitable relief. CFAA specific sections, and its successful cases, such as United States v. Nosal, 2011 and a series of common laws have allowed the successful approach in protecting the organization against cyber-attacks. Most hacks are catered under 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a) (6) which details trafficking in passwords for government and commerce computer.
Ilt.eff.org. (2019). Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) – Internet Law Treatise. Retrieved from https://ilt.eff.org/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act_(CFAA).html
McGowan, B. (2017). Eject the Floppy Disk: How to Modernize the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to Meet Cybersecurity Needs. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3018115Shackelford, S. (2012). Toward Cyber Peace: Managing Cyber Attacks Through Polycentric Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2132526
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more